• ISSN 2097-1893
  • CN 10-1855/P

朝鲜核试验相关地震学研究进展及其文献计量学分析

任梦依 边银菊 王婷婷 杨千里

引用本文: 任梦依,边银菊,王婷婷,杨千里. 2021. 朝鲜核试验相关地震学研究进展及其文献计量学分析. 地球与行星物理论评,52(3):326-340
Ren M Y, Bian Y J, Wang T T, Yang Q L. 2021. Research progress and bibliometric analysis of seismological research on North Korean nuclear test. Reviews of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, 52(3): 326-340

朝鲜核试验相关地震学研究进展及其文献计量学分析

doi: 10.19975/j.dqyxx.2020-029
基金项目: 军控核查技术资助项目
详细信息
    作者简介:

    任梦依(1988-),女,助理研究员,主要从事非天然地震监测与识别、地震危险性分析等方面的研究. E-mail:renmengyi@cea-igp.ac.cn

    通讯作者:

    边银菊(1964-),女,研究员,主要从事地震核查方面的研究. E-mail:bianyinju@cea-igp.ac.cn

  • 中图分类号: P315

Research progress and bibliometric analysis of seismological research on North Korean nuclear test

Funds: Supported by the Project of Arms Control Verification Technologies
  • 摘要: 朝鲜自2006年10月9日第一次开展地下核试验以来,分别于2009年5月25日、2013年2月12日、2016年1月6日、2016年9月9日和2017年9月3日相继进行了5次规模较大的核试验. 由于核爆炸和天然地震的震源机制不同,可以通过核爆炸产生的地震波来进行核试验的监测,核试验相关地震学研究一直是国内外专家关注的焦点. 本文分别从事件定位、性质识别、当量和埋藏深度等几个方面总结了近些年来朝鲜核试验相关地震学的研究进展,并基于文献计量学方法对朝鲜核试验相关地震学研究现状进行分析,综合结果表明,近些年基于朝鲜核试验的相关地震学研究的主要研究方向为核试验定位、当量估算以及震源深度等.

     

  • 图  1  不同研究机构及相关文献中给出的朝鲜核试验事件定位结果

    Figure  1.  Location results of North Korea's nuclear tests given by different research institutions and relevant literatures

    图  2  核爆与天然地震事件的谱比值对比(修改自赵连锋等,2017

    Figure  2.  Comparison between the spectrum ratios of nuclear explosions and those of natural earthquake events (modified from Zhao et al., 2017)

    图  3  UNT1埋藏深度及当量范围统计

    Figure  3.  Statistics of burial depth and yield range of UNT1

    图  4  UNT2埋藏深度及当量范围统计

    Figure  4.  Statistics of burial depth and yield range of UNT2

    图  5  UNT3埋藏深度及当量范围统计

    Figure  5.  Statistics of burial depth and yield range of UNT3

    图  6  UNT4埋藏深度及当量范围统计

    Figure  6.  Statistics of burial depth and yield range of UNT4

    图  7  UNT5埋藏深度及当量范围统计

    Figure  7.  Statistics of burial depth and yield range of UNT5

    图  8  UNT6埋藏深度及当量范围统计

    Figure  8.  Statistics of burial depth and yield range of UNT6

    图  9  中国东北和朝鲜半岛Q值分布图(修改自赵连锋等,2018). 图中:SB:松辽盆地;BB:渤海湾盆地;CM:长白山;JS:日本海

    Figure  9.  Distribution of Q values in Northeast China and the Korean Peninsula (modified from Zhao et al., 2018). In the picture, SB: Songliao basin; BB: Bohai bay basin; CM: Changbai mountain; JS: Japan Sea

    图  10  Web of Science核心数据库近20年文献出版年统计(源自Web of Science网站)

    Figure  10.  Annual statistics of publications in the core database of Web of Science in the recent 20 years (from Web of Science website)

    图  11  Web of Science核心数据库近20年文献发表量前10作者统计(源自Web of Science网站)

    Figure  11.  The 10 authors that published the most in the core database of Web of Science in the recent 20 years (from Web of Science website)

    图  12  Web of Science核心数据库近20年文献关键词热度图

    Figure  12.  Heat map of key words in the core database of Web of Science in the recent 20 years

    图  13  Web of Science核心数据库近20年文献关键词密度图

    Figure  13.  Density map of key words in the core database of Web of Science in the recent 20 years

    图  14  CNKI数据库近20年文献发表作者热度图

    Figure  14.  Heat map of literature authors in the CNKI database in the recent 20 years

    图  15  CNKI数据库近20年文献发表作者密度图

    Figure  15.  Density map of literature authors in the CNKI database in the recent 20 years

    图  16  CNKI数据库近20年文献关键词热度图

    Figure  16.  Heat map of key words in the CNKI database in the recent 20 years

    图  17  CNKI数据库近20年文献关键词密度图

    Figure  17.  Density map of key words in the CNKI database in the recent 20 years

    表  1  CTBTO网站上关于朝鲜6次核试验的相关信息

    Table  1.   North Korea's six nuclear tests information on CTBTO website

    日期时间(UTC)震级
    2006-10-0901:35:284.1
    2009-05-2500:54:43 4.52
    2013-02-1202:57:514.9
    2016-01-0601:30:00 4.85
    2016-09-0900:30 5.1
    2017-09-0303:30:066.1
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  朝鲜6次核试验定位结果统计

    Table  2.   Statistical results of the North Korea's six nuclear tests location

    朝鲜核试验纬度/(°N)经度/(°E)作者及发表时间
    UNT141.26386129.08591Rodgers et al., 2010
    41.2874129.1083Wen et al., 2010
    41.2867129.0902Murphy et al., 2013
    41.29192129.10907Myers et al., 2018
    UNT241.2939129.0871Wen et al., 2010
    41.2925129.0657Murphy et al., 2013
    41.2936129.0770Zhao et al., 2014
    41.29654129.08298Myers et al., 2018
    UNT341.2908129.0763Zhang and Wen, 2013
    41.2923129.0727Zhao et al., 2014
    41.29276129.07851Myers et al., 2018
    UNT441.3003129.0678Zhao et al., 2016
    41.3039129.0481Assink et al., 2016
    41.29932129.07622Myers et al., 2018
    UNT541.298129.080谢小碧和赵连锋,2018
    41.2976129.0804Zhao et al., 2017
    41.29983129.08157Myers et al., 2018
    UNT641.303129.070谢小碧和赵连锋,2018
    41.29999129.07901Myers et al., 2018
    41.3018129.0696He et al., 2018
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Assink J D, Averbuch G, Smets P S M, et al. 2016.On the infrasound detected from the 2013 and 2016 DPRK's underground nuclear tests[J]. Geophysical Research Letters,43(4):3526-3533.
    [2] Chaves E J, Lay T, Voytan D P. 2018.Yield estimate (230 kt) for a Mueller-Murphy model of the 3 September 2017, North Korean nuclear test (mbNEIC = 6.3) from teleseismicbroadband P waves assuming extensive near-source damage[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 45, 10314-10322. doi: 10.1029/2018GL079343
    [3] Chiang A, Ichinose G A, Dreger D S, et al. 2018. Moment tensor source-type analysis for the Democratic People's Republic of Korea–Declared nuclear explosions (2006–2017) and 3 September 2017 collapse event[J]. Seismological Research Letters, 89(6): 2152-2165.
    [4] Chun K Y, Wu Y, Henderson G A. 2011. Magnitude estimation and source discrimination: A close look at the 2006 and 2009 North Korean underground nuclear explosions[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 101(3): 1315-1329.
    [5] Gaber H, Elkholy S, Abdelazim M, et al. 2017. Seismological investigation of September 09 2016, North Korea underground nuclear test[J]. NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics, 6:278-286. doi: 10.1016/j.nrjag.2017.09.002
    [6] 范娜, 赵连峰, 谢小碧, 等. 2013. 朝鲜核爆的Rayleigh波震级测量[J]. 地球物理学报, 56(3): 906-915.

    Fan N, Zhao L F, Xie X B, et al. 2013.Measurement of Rayleigh-wave magnitudes for North Korean nuclear tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 56(3):906-915(in Chinese).
    [7] Gaebler P, Ceranna, Nooshiri N, et al. 2019. A multi-technology analysis of the 2017 North Korean nuclear test[J]. Solid Earth, 10(1):59-78. doi: 10.5194/se-10-59-2019
    [8] Gibbons S J, Kværna T, Näsholm S P, et al.2018. Probing the DPRK nuclear test site down to low-seismic magnitude[J]. Seismological Research Letters,89(6):2034-2041.
    [9] He X, Zhao L F, Xie X B, et al. 2018. High-precision relocation and event discrimination for the 3 September 2017 underground nuclear explosion and subsequent seismic events at the North Korean test site[J]. Seismological Research Letters, 89(6):2042-2048.
    [10] Hong T K, Lee J, Park S, et al. 2019.Seismic detection of strong ground motions by Mw 5.6 North Korean nuclear explosion[J]. Scientific Reports, 9:5124. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41627-x
    [11] Ichinose G A, Myers S C, Ford S R, et al. 2017. Relative surface wave amplitude and phase anomalies from the Democratic People's Republic of Korea announced nuclear tests[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 44, 8857-8864. doi: 10.1002/2017GL074577
    [12] Kim W Y, Richards P G. 2007. North Korean nuclear test: Seismic discrimination low yield[J]. EOS, 88(14):158-161.
    [13] Kim W Y, Richards P G, Schaff D, et al.2018. Identification of seismic events on and near the North Korean test site after the underground nuclear test explosion of 3 September 2017[J]. Seismological Research Letters, 89(6):2020-2030.
    [14] Koper K D, Herrmann R B, Benz H M. 2008. Overview of open seismic data from the North Korean event of 9 October 2006[J]. Seismological Research Letters,79(2):178-185.
    [15] Kvaerna T, Ringdal F, Baadshaug U. 2007.North Korea 's nuclear test: The capability for seismic monitoring of the North Korean test site[J]. Seismological Research Letters, 78(5): 487-497.
    [16] 林鑫, 姚振兴. 2016. 利用区域地震波形振幅包络约束朝鲜地下核试验的埋深和当量[J]. 地球物理学报, 59(6):2066-2079. doi: 10.6038/cjg20160613

    Lin X, Yao Z X. 2016.Yield and burial depth of the North Korean underground nuclear tests constrained by amplitude envelopes of regional seismic waveforms[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 59 (6): 2066-2079(in Chinese). doi: 10.6038/cjg20160613
    [17] 林鑫, 王向腾, 赵连锋, 等. 2019.核试验监测的地震学研究综述[J]. 地球物理学报, 62(11):4047-4066. doi: 10.6038/cjg2019M0556

    Lin X, Wang X T, Zhao L F, et al. 2019. A review of seismological research on nuclear test monitoring[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 62(11): 4047-4066(in Chinese). doi: 10.6038/cjg2019M0556
    [18] Liu J, Li L, Zahradník J, et al. 2018.North Korea's 2017 test and its nontectonic aftershock[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 45, 3017-3025. doi: 10.1002/2018GL077095
    [19] Murphy J R, Stevens J L, Kohl B C, et al. Advanced seismic analyses of the source characteristics of the 2006 and 2009 North Korean nuclear tests[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2013, 103(3):1640-1661. doi: 10.1785/0120120194
    [20] Myers S C, Ford S R, Mellors R J, et al. Absolute locations of the North Korean nuclear tests based on differential seismic arrival times and InSAR[J]. Seismological Research Letters, 2018, 89(6):2049-2058. doi: 10.1785/0220180123
    [21] Olsen K B, Begnaud M, Phillips S, et al. Constraints of crustal heterogeneity and Q(f) from regional (<4 Hz) wave propagation for the 2009 North Korea nuclear test[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2018, 108(3A):1369-1383. doi: 10.1785/0120170195
    [22] Pasyanos M E, Walter W R, Mayeda K M. Exploiting regional amplitude envelopes: A case study for earthquakes and explosions in the Korean Peninsula[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2012, 102(5): 1938-1948. doi: 10.1785/0120120012
    [23] Pasyanos M E, Myers S C. The coupled location/depth/yield problem for North Korea's declared nuclear tests[J]. Seismological Research Letters, 2018, 89(6):2059-2067. doi: 10.1785/0220180109
    [24] Rodgers A J, Petersson N A, Sjogreen B. Simulation of topographic effects on seismic waves from shallow explosions near the North Korean nuclear test site with emphasis on shear wave generation[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2010, 115, B11309. doi: 10.1029/2010JB007707
    [25] Rougier E, Patton H J, Knight E E, et al. Constraints on burial depth and yield of the 25 May 2009 North Korean test from hydrodynamic simulations in a granite medium[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2011, 38, L16316.
    [26] Schaff D P, Kim W Y, Richards P G, et al. Using waveform cross correlation for detection, location, and identification of aftershocks of the 2017 nuclear explosion at the North Korea test site[J]. Seismological Research Letters, 2018, 89(6): 2113-2119.
    [27] Schlittenhardt J, Canty M, Grünberg I. 2010. Satellite earth observations support CTBT monitoring: A case study of the nuclear test in North Korea of Oct. 9, 2006 and comparison with seismic results[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 167(4-5): 601-618.
    [28] So G K, Yefim G, Seoung-Kyu L. Depth estimate of the DPRK's 2006-10-09, 2009-05-25 and 2013-02-12 underground nuclear tests using local and teleseismic arrays[J]. Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 2018, 163(SEP.1):249-263.
    [29] So G K, Yefim G, Seoung-Kyu L. Depth calculation for the January 06, 2016, the September 09, 2016 and the September 03, 2017 nuclear tests of North Korea from detailed depth phases using regional and teleseismicarrays[J]. Pure and Applied Geophysics, 2019, 176, 133-146. doi: 10.1007/s00024-018-1958-y
    [30] Stevens J L, O'Brien M. 3D nonlinear calculation of the 2017 North Korean nuclear test[J]. Seismological Research Letters, 2018, 89(6):2068-2077. doi: 10.1785/0220180099
    [31] Tian D, Yao J, Wen L.2018. Collapse and earthquake swarm after North Korea's 3 September 2017 nuclear test[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 45:3976-3983. doi: 10.1029/2018GL077649
    [32] Wang D, Hutko A R.2018. Relative relocations of the North Korean nuclear tests from 2006 to 2017 using the Hi-net array in Japan[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 45:7481-7487. doi: 10.1029/2018GL078653
    [33] Wang T, Shi Q, Nikkhoo M, et al. 2018. The rise, collapse, and compaction of Mt. Mantap from the 3 September 2017 North Korean nuclear test[J]. Science, 361(6398):166-170.
    [34] 王向腾, 倪四道, 周勇, 等. 2019.地形起伏对基于地震波形的浅源地震深度反演影响—以2017年9月3日朝鲜M6.3事件为例[J]. 地球物理学报, 62(12):4684-4695. doi: 10.6038/cjg2019M0474

    Wang X T, Ni S D, Zhou Y, et al.2019. Topography effects for focal depth inversion of shallow earthquakes based on waveforms: A case study for the M6.3 event on 3 September 2017 in Democratic People’s Republic of Korea[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 62(12): 4684-4695(in Chinese). doi: 10.6038/cjg2019M0474
    [35] Wen L, Long H. 2010. High-precision location of North Korea's 2009 nuclear test[J]. Seismological Research Letters, 81(1): 26-29. doi: 10.1785/gssrl.81.1.26
    [36] Wei M. 2017.Location and source characteristics of the 2016 January 6 North Korean nuclear test constrained by InSAR[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 209, 762-769. doi: 10.1093/gji/ggx053
    [37] 谢小碧, 赵连锋. 2018.朝鲜地下核试验的地震学观测[J]. 地球物理学报, 61(3):889-904. doi: 10.6038/cjg2018L0677

    Xie X B, Zhao L F. 2018.The seismic characterization of North Korea underground nuclear tests[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics, 61(3): 889-904(in Chinese). doi: 10.6038/cjg2018L0677
    [38] 徐小辉, 李杰, 王明洋.2019.地下强爆炸诱发地表塌陷的试验模拟与应用[J]. 爆炸与冲击, 39(8),084202. doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0167

    Xu X H, Li J, Wang M Y. 2019.Simulation and analysis of surface subsidence associated with the underground strong explosion[J]. Explosion and Shock Waves,39(8): 084202(in Chinese). doi: 10.11883/bzycj-2019-0167
    [39] Yao J, Tian D, Sun L, et al. 2018a. Source characteristics of North Korea's 3 September 2017 nuclear test[J]. Seismological Research Letters, 89(6):2078-2084.
    [40] Yao J, Tian D, Lu Z, et al. 2018b.Triggered seismicity after North Korea's 3 September 2017 nuclear test[J]. Seismological Research Letters,89(6):2085-2093. doi: 10.1785/0220180135
    [41] Zhang M, Wen L. 2013.High-precision location and yield of North Korea's 2013 nuclear test[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(12): 2941-2946. doi: 10.1002/grl.50607
    [42] Zhao L F, Xie X B, Wang W M, et al.2008. Regional seismic characteristics of the 9 October 2006 North Korean nuclear test[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,98(6): 2571-2589. doi: 10.1785/0120080128
    [43] Zhao L F, Xie X B, Wang W M, et al. 2012.Yield estimation of the 25 May 2009 North Korean nuclear explosion[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 102(2): 467-478. doi: 10.1785/0120110163
    [44] Zhao L F, Xie X B, Wang W M, et al.2014.The 12 February 2013 North Korean underground nuclear test[J]. Seismological Research Letters, 85(1): 130-134. doi: 10.1785/0220130103
    [45] Zhao L F, Xie X B, Tian B F, et al. 2015.Pn wave geometrical spreading and attenuation in Northeast China and the Korean Peninsula constrained by observations from North Korean nuclear explosions[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 120(11)::7558-7571. doi: 10.1002/2015JB012205
    [46] Zhao L F, Xie X B, Wang W M, et al. 2016. Seismological investigation of the 2016 January 6 North Korean underground nuclear test[J]. Geophysical Journal International, 206(3):1487-1491.
    [47] Zhao L F, Xie X B, Wang W M, et al. 2017.The 9 September 2016 North Korean underground nuclear test[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 107(6):1-8.
    [48] 赵连锋, 谢小碧, 何熹, 等.2017.2017年9月3日朝鲜地下核试验的地震学鉴别和当量估计[J]. 科学通报, 62 (35): 93-98.

    Zhao L F, Xie X B, He X, et al.2017. Seismological discrimination and yield estimation of the 3 September 2017 Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) underground nuclear test[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 62 (35): 93-98(in Chinese).
    [49] 赵连锋, 谢小碧, 王卫民, 等. 2018.中国东北和朝鲜半岛地区地壳Lg波宽频带衰减模型[J]. 地球物理学报, 61(3):856-871. doi: 10.6038/cjg2018L0394

    Zhao L F, Xie X B, Wang W M, et al. 2018.A broadband crustal Lg wave attenuation model in Northeast China and the Korean Peninsula[J]. Chinese Journal of Geophysics,61(3):856-871(in Chinese). doi: 10.6038/cjg2018L0394
  • 加载中
图(17) / 表(2)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  600
  • HTML全文浏览量:  358
  • PDF下载量:  79
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-12-30
  • 录用日期:  2021-01-29
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-09-13
  • 刊出日期:  2021-05-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回