China Seismic Experimental Site: Retrospective and prospective
-
1) 注:根据中国地震台网中心的资料.
-
表 1 我国目前地震预测的主要业务及其科技产品(其中带星号的尚不成熟)
Table 1. The major professional work and its technological products of earthquake prediction in China (The ones with an asterisk are not yet mature)
大尺度:全国范围 中尺度:地震危险区 小尺度:地震断层 十年尺度长期预测 十年尺度地震危险区 地震灾害情景构建﹡ 年尺度中期预测 地震大形势 危险区紧迫程度判定
年度地震危险区近断层密集监测﹡ 周月尺度短期预测 大尺度短期预测﹡ 危险区跟踪监视﹡
地震前兆效能检验可操作地震预测﹡ 震后趋势预测 动态应力触发与
地震形势影响评估﹡地震静态应力触发 地震序列预测
次生灾害预测﹡ -
[1] Bakun W H, Lindh A G. 1985. The Parkfield, California, earthquake prediction experiment[J]. Science, 229: 619-624. doi: 10.1126/science.229.4714.619 [2] China Seismic Experimental Site. 2020. Progress Report of China Seismic Experimental Site (2019) [M]. Seismological Press (to be published) (in Chinese). [3] Davis J F, Somerville P. 1982. Comparison of earthquake prediction approaches in the Tokai area of Japan and in California[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 72: S367-S392. [4] 地震预报发展规划工作组. 2010. 地震预报实验场: 科学问题与科学目标[J]. 中国地震, 26: 1-13. [5] Evans R, Beamish D, Crampin S, Ucer S B. 1987. The Turkish dilatancy project (TDP3): Multidisciplinary studies of a potential earthquake source region[J]. Geophysical Journal of Royal Astronomical Society, 91: 265-286. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1987.tb05227.x [6] Fraser L H, Henry H AL, Carlyle C N, et al. 2012. Coordinated distributed experiments: An emerging tool for testing global hypotheses in ecology and environmental science[J]. Frontier in Ecology and Environment Science, 11: 147-155. [7] Gupta H K. 2001. Short-term earthquake forecasting maybe feasible at Koyna, India[J]. Tectonophysics, 338: 353-357. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00083-X [8] Madu C R, Kuei C-H. 2018. Handbook of Disaster Risk Reduction & Management[M]. Singapore: World Scientific. [9] Mogi K. 2004. Two grave issues concerning the expected Tokai earthquake[J]. Earth, Plants and Space, 56: li-lxvi. doi: 10.1186/BF03353074. [10] Roeloffs E. 2000. The Parkfield California earthquake experiment: An update in 2000[J]. Current Science, 79: 1226-1236. [11] Stefansson R, Bergerat F, Bonafede M, et al. 1998. PRENLAB Final Report[R]. Reykjavik. [12] Stefánsson R, Bergerat F, Bonafede M, et al. 2001. PRENLAB-TWO-final report[R]. Veourstofa Islands Report. [13] 孙其政, 吴书贵. 2007. 中国地震监测预报四十年[M]. 地震出版社.Sun Q Z, Wu S G. 2007. Development of the Earthquake Monitoring and Prediction in China during 1966~2006[M]. Seismological Press (in Chinese). [14] Working Group for the Long-term Plan of Earthquake Forecast and Prediction (2010~2020), China Earthquake Administration. 2010. Earthquake prediction experiment site: design, performance evaluation, and implementation [J]. Earthquake Research in China. 26: 1-13(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2010.01.001 [15] Working Group on the Scientific Challenges Report, China Seismic Experimental Site. 2019. China Seismic Experimental Site: Scientific Challenges[M]. China Standard Press (in Chinese). [16] Wu Z L, Zhang Y, Li J W. 2019. Coordinated Distributed Experiments (CDEs) applied to earthquake forecast test sites[M]//Li Y -G. Earthquake and Disaster Risk: Decade Retrospective of the Wenchuan Earthquake. Beijing: Higher Education Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd., 107-115. [17] Wu Z L. 2020a. Seismic experimental sites: challenges and opportunities [J]. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 95: 113-116, DOI: 10.1007/s12594-020-1400-9. [18] Wu Z L.2020b. Time-dependent Seismic Hazard Assessment[M]//Gupta H K. Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics. Amsterdam: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10475-7_256-1. [19] 中国地震科学实验场. 2020. 中国地震科学实验场工作进展[M]. 地震出版社(待出版). [20] 中国地震科学实验场科学设计编写组. 2019. 中国地震科学实验场科学设计[M]. 中国标准出版社. [21] 朱传镇.1991. 日、美、苏地震预报研究的主要进展[J]. 地震地磁观测研究, 12(5): 37-47.Zhu C Z. 1991. Main development on earthquake prediction research in Japan, USA, and USR [J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 12(5): 37-47 (in Chinese). -

计量
- 文章访问数: 868
- HTML全文浏览量: 458
- PDF下载量: 215
- 被引次数: 0