• ISSN 2097-1893
  • CN 10-1855/P

中国地震科学实验场:历史与未来

吴忠良 丁志峰 张晓东 李丽 邵志刚 李营 胡春峰 车时

引用本文: 吴忠良,丁志峰,张晓东,李丽,邵志刚,李营,胡春峰,车时. 2021. 中国地震科学实验场:历史与未来. 地球与行星物理论评,52(2):234-238
Wu Z L, Ding Z F, Zhang X D, Li L, Shao Z G, Li Y, Hu C F, Che S. 2021. China Seismic Experimental Site: Retrospective and prospective. Reviews of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, 52(2): 234-238

中国地震科学实验场:历史与未来

doi: 10.19975/j.dqyxx.2020-023
详细信息
    通讯作者:

    吴忠良(1963-),男,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事地震学与地震监测预测研究. E-mail:wuzl@cea-igp.ac.cn

  • 注:根据中国地震台网中心的资料.
  • 中图分类号: P315

China Seismic Experimental Site: Retrospective and prospective

  • 1)  注:根据中国地震台网中心的资料.
  • 表  1  我国目前地震预测的主要业务及其科技产品(其中带星号的尚不成熟)

    Table  1.   The major professional work and its technological products of earthquake prediction in China (The ones with an asterisk are not yet mature)

    大尺度:全国范围中尺度:地震危险区小尺度:地震断层
    十年尺度长期预测十年尺度地震危险区地震灾害情景构建﹡
    年尺度中期预测地震大形势危险区紧迫程度判定
    年度地震危险区
    近断层密集监测﹡
    周月尺度短期预测大尺度短期预测﹡危险区跟踪监视﹡
    地震前兆效能检验
    可操作地震预测﹡
    震后趋势预测动态应力触发与
    地震形势影响评估﹡
    地震静态应力触发地震序列预测
    次生灾害预测﹡
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] Bakun W H, Lindh A G. 1985. The Parkfield, California, earthquake prediction experiment[J]. Science, 229: 619-624. doi: 10.1126/science.229.4714.619
    [2] China Seismic Experimental Site. 2020. Progress Report of China Seismic Experimental Site (2019) [M]. Seismological Press (to be published) (in Chinese).
    [3] Davis J F, Somerville P. 1982. Comparison of earthquake prediction approaches in the Tokai area of Japan and in California[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 72: S367-S392.
    [4] 地震预报发展规划工作组. 2010. 地震预报实验场: 科学问题与科学目标[J]. 中国地震, 26: 1-13.
    [5] Evans R, Beamish D, Crampin S, Ucer S B. 1987. The Turkish dilatancy project (TDP3): Multidisciplinary studies of a potential earthquake source region[J]. Geophysical Journal of Royal Astronomical Society, 91: 265-286. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.1987.tb05227.x
    [6] Fraser L H, Henry H AL, Carlyle C N, et al. 2012. Coordinated distributed experiments: An emerging tool for testing global hypotheses in ecology and environmental science[J]. Frontier in Ecology and Environment Science, 11: 147-155.
    [7] Gupta H K. 2001. Short-term earthquake forecasting maybe feasible at Koyna, India[J]. Tectonophysics, 338: 353-357. doi: 10.1016/S0040-1951(01)00083-X
    [8] Madu C R, Kuei C-H. 2018. Handbook of Disaster Risk Reduction & Management[M]. Singapore: World Scientific.
    [9] Mogi K. 2004. Two grave issues concerning the expected Tokai earthquake[J]. Earth, Plants and Space, 56: li-lxvi. doi: 10.1186/BF03353074.
    [10] Roeloffs E. 2000. The Parkfield California earthquake experiment: An update in 2000[J]. Current Science, 79: 1226-1236.
    [11] Stefansson R, Bergerat F, Bonafede M, et al. 1998. PRENLAB Final Report[R]. Reykjavik.
    [12] Stefánsson R, Bergerat F, Bonafede M, et al. 2001. PRENLAB-TWO-final report[R]. Veourstofa Islands Report.
    [13] 孙其政, 吴书贵. 2007. 中国地震监测预报四十年[M]. 地震出版社.

    Sun Q Z, Wu S G. 2007. Development of the Earthquake Monitoring and Prediction in China during 1966~2006[M]. Seismological Press (in Chinese).
    [14] Working Group for the Long-term Plan of Earthquake Forecast and Prediction (2010~2020), China Earthquake Administration. 2010. Earthquake prediction experiment site: design, performance evaluation, and implementation [J]. Earthquake Research in China. 26: 1-13(in Chinese). doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4683.2010.01.001
    [15] Working Group on the Scientific Challenges Report, China Seismic Experimental Site. 2019. China Seismic Experimental Site: Scientific Challenges[M]. China Standard Press (in Chinese).
    [16] Wu Z L, Zhang Y, Li J W. 2019. Coordinated Distributed Experiments (CDEs) applied to earthquake forecast test sites[M]//Li Y -G. Earthquake and Disaster Risk: Decade Retrospective of the Wenchuan Earthquake. Beijing: Higher Education Press and Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd., 107-115.
    [17] Wu Z L. 2020a. Seismic experimental sites: challenges and opportunities [J]. Journal of the Geological Society of India, 95: 113-116, DOI: 10.1007/s12594-020-1400-9.
    [18] Wu Z L.2020b. Time-dependent Seismic Hazard Assessment[M]//Gupta H K. Encyclopedia of Solid Earth Geophysics. Amsterdam: Springer Nature Switzerland AG, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-10475-7_256-1.
    [19] 中国地震科学实验场. 2020. 中国地震科学实验场工作进展[M]. 地震出版社(待出版).
    [20] 中国地震科学实验场科学设计编写组. 2019. 中国地震科学实验场科学设计[M]. 中国标准出版社.
    [21] 朱传镇.1991. 日、美、苏地震预报研究的主要进展[J]. 地震地磁观测研究, 12(5): 37-47.

    Zhu C Z. 1991. Main development on earthquake prediction research in Japan, USA, and USR [J]. Seismological and Geomagnetic Observation and Research, 12(5): 37-47 (in Chinese).
  • 加载中
表(1)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  868
  • HTML全文浏览量:  458
  • PDF下载量:  215
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2020-11-06
  • 录用日期:  2020-12-21
  • 网络出版日期:  2021-09-13
  • 刊出日期:  2021-03-01

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回