• ISSN 2097-1893
    • CN 10-1855/P

    云遥GNSS掩星F2层峰值参数与湿廓线质量评估

    Quality assessment of F2-layer peak parameters and wet atmospheric profiles from YUNYAO GNSS radio occultation

    • 摘要: 云遥卫星全球导航卫星系统无线电掩星(Global Navigation Satellite System Radio Occultation, GNSS RO)产品是国产商业掩星资料的重要组成部分. 为系统评估其数据质量,基于2025 年 2~3 月和 7 月云遥卫星电离层产品,以及 2025 年 7 月中性大气剖面产品,分别以 COSMIC-2 掩星资料、全球地基垂测仪网络(Global Ionosphere Radio Observatory, GIRO)资料和全球无线电探空资料(Integrated Global Radiosonde Archive, IGRA)为参考,对电离层产品中的 F2 层峰值电子密度(NmF2)、峰值高度(hmF2)以及中性大气温度、折射率、水汽压和比湿廓线进行综合质量评估. 结果表明,云遥电离层产品与 COSMIC-2 具有较高一致性, NmF2 和 hmF2 相关系数分别为0.932和0.956,平均偏差分别为-7.37×109 el·m−3和0.62 km;云遥电离层产品与 GIRO 资料对比结果显示,NmF2 和 hmF2 相关系数分别为 0.934 和 0.739,平均偏差分别为 1.12×1011 el·m−3和11.80 km. 中性大气产品评估结果显示,云遥与 COSMIC-2、IGRA 在温度和折射率方面均具有较好一致性. 云遥与 COSMIC-2 在 925~10 hPa 范围内的温度平均偏差为−0.025 K,折射率平均相对偏差为 0.05%;云遥与 IGRA 在 925~10 hPa 范围内的温度平均偏差为−0.028 K,折射率平均相对偏差为 0.12%. 云遥与 COSMIC-2、IGRA 在 925~200 hPa 范围内的水汽压平均相对偏差分别为 18.23% 和 18.24%,比湿平均偏差分别为 0.010 g/kg 和−0.092 g/kg. 比湿偏差整体量级较小,云遥与参考资料在水汽含量上总体接近,水汽压相对偏差在不同气压层之间存在一定变化,湿度变量的解释需结合低湿背景、反演方法和参考资料误差综合分析. 综合来看,云遥卫星 GNSS RO 产品在电离层F2 层峰值参数以及温度、折射率和湿度廓线方面具有较好的数据质量,可为电离层监测、大气垂直结构分析和资料同化提供数据参考.

       

      Abstract:
      The YUNYAO Global Navigation Satellite System Radio Occultation (GNSS RO) products are an important component of China’s commercial radio occultation datasets. With the rapid development of commercial low-Earth-orbit satellite constellations, it is necessary to assess the quality of these new GNSS RO products using mature satellite missions and independent ground-based observations. In this study, YUNYAO ionospheric products from February-March and July 2025 and YUNYAO neutral atmospheric profile products from July 2025 are evaluated. COSMIC-2 RO products, Global Ionosphere Radio Observatory (GIRO) ionosonde data, and Integrated Global Radiosonde Archive (IGRA) radiosonde data are used as reference datasets. The ionospheric evaluation focuses on the F2-layer peak electron density (NmF2) and peak height (hmF2) extracted from ionPrf electron density profiles. The neutral atmospheric evaluation includes temperature, refractivity, water vapor pressure, and specific humidity profiles.
      For the ionospheric products, profile quality control and spatiotemporal matching were first performed before statistical comparison. The YUNYAO-COSMIC-2 comparison shows good consistency in both F2-layer peak parameters. The correlation coefficients of NmF2 and hmF2 are 0.932 and 0.956, respectively, and the mean biases are −7.37×109 el·m−3 and 0.62 km, respectively. These results indicate that YUNYAO and COSMIC-2 have similar capability in describing the overall variation of F2-layer peak parameters, especially for hmF2. The comparison between YUNYAO and GIRO ionosonde data also shows a clear positive correlation. The correlation coefficients of NmF2 and hmF2 are 0.934 and 0.739, respectively, with mean biases of 1.12×1011 el·m−3 and 11.80 km, respectively. Compared with the YUNYAO-COSMIC-2 comparison, the YUNYAO-GIRO comparison shows larger bias and dispersion, which may be related to differences in observing geometry, spatial representativeness, local ionospheric horizontal gradients, and the automatic interpretation uncertainty of ionosonde parameters.
      For the neutral atmospheric products, YUNYAO wetPrf profiles were compared with COSMIC-2 wetPf2 products and IGRA radiosonde profiles after interpolation to standard pressure levels. Temperature and refractivity were evaluated within 925-10 hPa, while water vapor pressure and specific humidity were evaluated within 925-200 hPa because water vapor content is very low in the upper levels. Compared with COSMIC-2, the mean temperature bias and mean relative refractivity bias of YUNYAO are −0.025 K and 0.05%, respectively, within 925-10 hPa. Compared with IGRA, the corresponding values are −0.028 K and 0.12%, respectively. These results suggest that YUNYAO has good consistency with both RO and radiosonde reference datasets in temperature and refractivity. For humidity-related variables, the mean relative biases of water vapor pressure between YUNYAO and COSMIC-2 and between YUNYAO and IGRA are 18.23% and 18.24%, respectively, within 925-200 hPa. The corresponding mean specific humidity biases are 0.010 g/kg and -0.092 g/kg, respectively. The specific humidity biases are small in magnitude, indicating that YUNYAO and the reference datasets are generally close in water vapor content, while the relative bias of water vapor pressure shows more evident variations among different pressure levels. This difference is likely associated with the enhanced sensitivity of relative water vapor pressure statistics to small background values under low-humidity conditions.
      Overall, the YUNYAO GNSS RO products show good data quality in F2-layer ionospheric peak parameters, as well as in neutral atmospheric temperature, refractivity, and humidity profiles. The agreement with COSMIC-2, GIRO, and IGRA indicates that YUNYAO products have potential value for ionospheric monitoring and atmospheric vertical structure analysis. Meanwhile, the interpretation of humidity-related variables should consider the influence of low-humidity background conditions, retrieval methods, and reference-data uncertainties. The results of this study can provide useful data references for ionospheric monitoring, atmospheric structure analysis, and numerical weather prediction data assimilation. Further assessments based on longer time series and more diverse seasonal, local-time, latitudinal, and space-weather conditions would help examine the multi-scenario applicability of YUNYAO GNSS RO products.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回