• ISSN 2097-1893
  • CN 10-1855/P
冯金扬,吴书清,李春剑,王启宇,牟丽爽,粟多武. 2022. 绝对重力仪国际比对方法. 地球与行星物理论评,53(3):269-277. DOI: 10.19975/j.dqyxx.2021-059
引用本文: 冯金扬,吴书清,李春剑,王启宇,牟丽爽,粟多武. 2022. 绝对重力仪国际比对方法. 地球与行星物理论评,53(3):269-277. DOI: 10.19975/j.dqyxx.2021-059
Feng J Y, Wu S Q, Li C J, Wang Q Y, Mou L S, Su D W. 2022. International comparison method of absolute gravimeter. Reviews of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, 53(3): 269-277. DOI: 10.19975/j.dqyxx.2021-059
Citation: Feng J Y, Wu S Q, Li C J, Wang Q Y, Mou L S, Su D W. 2022. International comparison method of absolute gravimeter. Reviews of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, 53(3): 269-277. DOI: 10.19975/j.dqyxx.2021-059

绝对重力仪国际比对方法

International comparison method of absolute gravimeter

  • 摘要: 重力计量的主要任务之一是确保全球重力测量活动的国际互认和量值统一,以及确保各行各业重力测量结果的溯源性和准确性. 中国计量科学研究院先后主办了第一届亚太区域绝对重力仪国际比对和第十届全球绝对重力仪国际比对(ICAG-2017),本文结合主导国际比对活动的经验,首先介绍了国际比对的准备和组织工作,包括比对前的垂直重力梯度和潮汐模型的观测、比对期间开展的衍射光束修正量测量和测量点位安排等. 其次,基于数据预处理、观测模型、约束方程等进行比对数据处理,通过符合性检验验证仪器不确定度的评估是否合理,最终可以计算得到仪器的等效度及短期复现性. 最后结合对历次比对结果的比较,分析了国际比对对大地测量研究及应用中提升观测数据准确性的重要意义,提出现阶段重力计量工作面临的一些问题.

     

    Abstract:
    Gravitational acceleration metrology is the primary means to ensure the international mutual recognition and uniformity of gravity measurement activities, and guarantees the traceability and accuracy of gravity measurement results. Absolute gravimeters are taken as the main tool and carrier for the traceability and transmission of the gravity acceleration value. It can be used as a standard for periodic calibration of the relative gravimeters, as a "ruler" for land, ocean, aviation, and satellite gravity measurement. The National Institute of Metrology (China) has held the First International Comparison in Asia Pacific Regional and the 10th International Comparison of Absolute Gravimeters (ICAG-2017). Based on the former experiences, this paper introduces the preparation, organization and evaluation method of all international comparison measurements. Firstly, the site selection of comparison, observation of vertical gravity gradient, and tidal model before the comparison is introduced. During the comparison, the measurements for the diffraction beam correction and the arrangement of measurement sites were demonstrated. Then, the raw comparison measurements were transferred to the same heights and time, and performed based on the given observation model and constraint equation. After pre-processing, the evaluation of the instrument uncertainty was verified through a compliance test, the degree of instrument equivalence (DoE) and short-term reproducibility were calculated. By analyzing previous comparison results, this paper discusses the significance of international comparison in improving the accuracy of observation data in geophysical research and application, and puts forward some problems faced in the current stage.

     

/

返回文章
返回